• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:

    公开号:NL2012327A
    申请号:NL2012327
    申请日:2014-02-26
    公开日:2015-08-27
    发明作者:Mathias Pantus；Jeroen Paske；Pascal Mortel；Leon Mintjens；Sorin Costiner；Michael Giering；Robert Labarre；Mark Vogel；Vijaya Lakamraju
    申请人:Utc Fire & Security B V；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    SELECTIVE INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS FIELD OF THE INVENTION
    The present invention is directed to the field of intrusion, detection and alarm systems, and more particularly, to a novel selective intrusion detection system. The selectivity is aimed towards the capability of distinguishing humans from other moving targets that will be used in a variety of fields related to security systems.
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
    The concept of intrusion detection systems is well known in the art such as US
    6.239.736. However such systems do not contain any selectivity means as disclosed in US 6.239.736. Therefore in many applications, such systems according to the prior art, will be prone to unwanted alarms from for example animals, geo-seismic activities, environmental disturbances (street traffic, water running through pipes, swaying trees, ceiling fans, oscillating fans, air conditioning systems, and the like), that may be moving in or near the surveillance space. For example, for indoor residential settings, pets are a major source of unwanted alarm triggers. In such applications, it is desired to have an alert provided upon the presence of a human intruder, and to forego an alert upon the presence of pets and other moving targets.
    Prior attempts have been made to distinguish the human presence from the presence of other moving targets, but with limited success. Current technologies for monitoring, such as video cameras or microphone arrays, typically involve sensors with high spatial resolution. Such sensors are relatively complex and unreliable as they may require a human in the process loop to watch the signal in real time and manually enter the decision about the signal analyses of the operators observation, that is, whether the signal from such sensor originates from a human or from another moving target. Moreover, video surveillance will present privacy concerns, especially in residential and office surveillance systems.
    There is a need in the art for intrusion detection systems with advanced selectivity in creating an alarm whilst detecting a human intruder, and foregoing an alarm whilst detecting other moving targets autonomously, without the need of a human decision. The present disclosure provides a solution for the functional selective intrusion detection system need and advances the state of the art by providing reliable, robust, and autonomous decision making.
    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
    An intrusion detection system is provided that includes, inter alia, a radar transceiver configured and adapted to receive radar signals indicative of moving targets present in a surveillance space. A processor is operatively connected to the radar transceiver to convert the radar signals into spectrograms and to determine whether any given spectrogram is indicative of presence of a human or another moving target in the surveillance space. An alarm indicator is operatively connected to the processor and is configured to provide an alert in the event the processor determines any given spectrogram is indicative of a human, and to forego providing an alert in the event the processor determines any given spectrogram is indicative only of other moving targets.
    In certain embodiments, the processor is configured and adapted to determine whether any given spectrogram is indicative of a human based on a set of predetermined factors. The set of predetermined factors can include one or more of distribution of maximum Doppler power spectral density, frequency bin of the torso Doppler, frequency bin of the leg Doppler, frequency bins of the -6 dB torso Doppler points, the upper point, the lower point, average power generated by the legs, average of the frequencies with the power higher than a predetermined threshold, Q-factor, and higher order factors.
    In another aspect, the processor can be configured and adapted to determine whether any given spectrogram is indicative of a human based on a predetermined algorithm that calculates an indicator for a human or for other moving targets. For example, if the indicator is defined on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0, with 0.0 being indicative of a other moving targets, and 1.0 being indicative of a human, the processor and alarm can be configured to provide an alert if the indicator has a value greater than about 0.5. In another aspect, the processor can be configured and adapted to convert radar signals into spectrograms using a set of modules including one or more of windowing, overlapping, short-time Fourier transform, dipping, binning, noise elimination, logarithmic conversion, amplitude correction, time grouping, whitening by means of horizontal and vertical bar-removal, vertical smoothing, and horizontal smoothing.
    In certain embodiments, the intrusion detection system also includes a selectivity mode switch which alters the sensitivity of the processor in distinguishing between the presence of a human or another moving target. In certain embodiments, the intrusion system also includes range controlled radar technology operatively connected to the radar transceiver to adjust the surveillance space.
    In certain embodiments, the intrusion detection system also includes a smart diagnostic system operatively connected to the processer to store spectrograms and corresponding user input for human/other moving target determinations to a database and to update determination processes of the processor based on the database. The smart detection system can use a plurality of basic features, such as Doppler strength, support vector machine (SVM) value, and human/other moving target identifiers to functionally save events for diagnostic purposes and continuously improve the performance using ground truth provided by a user or other sensor. In some embodiments, the intrusion detection system further includes communication means operatively connected to the processer to send spectrograms to an up-stream server to enable detailed selectivity processing further up-stream and to alleviate complexity and current consumption constraints down-stream. A method of detecting intrusion is also provided, including the steps of converting a radar signal received from a surveillance space into a spectrogram. The method also includes analyzing the spectrogram to determine if any moving targets indicated in the spectrogram are human or other moving targets.
    In certain embodiments, the step of analyzing the spectrogram includes extracting predetermined factors from the spectrogram and calculating an identifier for determining if any moving targets indicated in the spectrogram are human or other moving targets based on applying a predetermined algorithm to the predetermined factors. The method can further include the step of providing an alert for a given identifier value. The predetermined factors set can be indicative of variables in radar spectrograms of humans and other moving targets. The predetermined factors can also include variables that represent motion dynamics and biometric characteristics that distinguish humans and other moving targets. The predetermined factors can also be robust to noise. Test data has shown that accuracy of the system is maintained with an additional three decibels of Gaussian noise.
    An embodiment of the selective intrusion detection system is provided that includes, inter alia, a Radar, Sonar or Lidar transceiver configured and adapted to receive Doppler return signals indicative of moving targets present in a surveillance space, A processor is operatively connected to the Doppler transceiver to convert the Doppler return signals into spectrograms and to determine whether any given spectrogram is indicative of presence of a human, or other moving targets moving throughout the surveillance space. The selectivity comprises means to create an alarm indication as a result of genuine intruder motion being present in the surveillance space and forego an alarm in cases of other moving targets (such as domestic pets; cats, dogs, birds, parrot), environmental disturbances (such as greenery, moving trees, weather, rodents, vermin, life stock), IBS (Intrinsic Building Signals, such as air conditioning units, fans, oscillating fans, ceiling fans, fluorescent lighting, geo-seismic activities, or water running through pipes), EMI (electromagnetic interferences, such as RFI radio frequency interference and ESD electrostatic discharges), as well as fluorescent light influence and the like.
    In certain embodiments, the selective intrusion detection system also includes a selectivity mode switch for adapting the selectivity of the processor in order to match the security and financial risk as needed to the application at hand.
    An embodiment of the intrusion alarm system for detecting the presence of a moving target in the presence of interfering phenomena includes a Doppler transceiver for transmitting signals into a surveillance zone; means for reception of Doppler signals returned from said surveillance zone; means for providing a spectrogram; and means for scene analysis of the spectrogram in order to determine respective origins of Doppler targets for providing reliable intrusion security and forgoing privacy issues. The Doppler transceiver can be a radar transceiver, a sonar transceiver, a Lidar transceiver, a range-gated-radar transceiver, or the like.
    An embodiment of the intrusion alarm system for detecting the presence of a moving target in the presence of interfering phenomena includes a Doppler transceiver for transmitting signals into a surveillance zone; means for reception of Doppler signals returned from said surveillance zone; means to provide a spectrogram; means for Doppler signal conditioning; means for scene analysis from momentary spectrogram data; means to evaluate aggregated data; and means to provide statistical analysis. The means for reception of Doppler signals, the means to provide a spectrogram, the means for Doppler signal conditioning, the means for scene analysis, the means to evaluate aggregated data, and the means to provide statistical analysis are all operatively connected to a support-vector-machine that is loaded with a learning kernel trained with real-truths of a multitude of cases, followed by a hierarchical decision making, in order to provide an alert in the case of human target presence in the surveillance zone and to forego an alert in the event of other moving targets and interference phenomenon. The Doppler transceiver can be a radar transceiver, a sonar transceiver, a Lidar transceiver, a range-gated-radar transceiver, or the like.
    In certain embodiments, the spectrogram output signal can be de-noised by nullification of unneeded noise-columns, and/or whitened by reduction of deterministic signals. A plurality of momentary characteristic values of scene-analysis can be calculated and recorded from the spectrogram. The characteristic values can include one or more of the following: tracking a torso velocity of the target, an upper -6 dB point of a torso velocity signal, a lower -6 dB point of a torso velocity signal, tracking a leg velocity of the target, a difference of frequency indices of upper and lower -6 dB points of a torso velocity signal, power generated from a torso signal, an average power generated from a leg signal, an average power per Short Time Fourier Transform, an average power of frequencies between upper and lower -6 dB points of a torso velocity, an average of frequency indices with power over 20 dB with reference to an average background noise, a frequency index at 85% of a cumulative sum of a signal amplitude per Short Time Fourier Transform, a -6 dB Q-factor of power generated from a torso signal. The characteristic values can be recorded over a three-second period of time.
    According to certain embodiments, a plurality of aggregated values can be calculated from the characteristic values. The aggregated values can relate to at least one of the following average torso power, leg periodicity, torso periodicity, phasing between leg and torso periodicity, a ratio between a maximum frequency of leg velocity tracking and an average frequency of torso velocity tracking, a mean of a power spectrum profile, standard deviation of a power spectrum profile, an upper -6 dB point of torso velocity signal periodicity, a lower -6 dB point of torso velocity signal periodicity, phasing between torso periodicity and an upper -6 dB point of torso velocity signal periodicity, phasing between torso periodicity and a lower -6 dB point of torso velocity signal periodicity, phasing between an upper -6 dB point of torso velocity signal periodicity and a lower -6 dB point of torso velocity signal periodicity, a ratio between average torso energy and average leg energy, a standard deviation of a Fast Fourier Transform of torso velocity tracking, a standard deviation of a Fast Fourier Transform of leg velocity tracking. A plurality of statistical values can be calculated from the characteristic values. The statistical values can relate to at least one of a mean, a standard deviation, a modal value, a minimum value, a maximum value, and a median value. The statistical values can be selected through at least one of correlations and mutual information, to optimize system selectivity and robustness to noise while minimizing computational cost. The aggregated values and statistical values can provide a decision about an origin of the target by means of a pre-educated support-vector machine. The support vector machine can include local kemel components to separate islands of different classes of events and global kernel components that extend over a whole domain of events, wherein an optimization of parameters of the support vector machine for optimal selectivity is performed by an accelerated random search. Data output from the support vector machine can be passed through hierarchical decision making.
    In certain embodiments, the intrusion alarm system further includes a plurality of settings to adjust a selectivity function. The settings can be optimized for a security application, for a security risk of an installation at hand, for a detection, priority need of an installation at hand, or the like. In certain embodiments, learning kemels are re-trained in order to alternate and blend the decision making, to provide an optimum detection solution for an application at hand, and to accommodate needs of security installers and users, A database holding real-truth events can be extended to continuously improve hierarchal decision making.
    In certain embodiments, the intrusion alarm system can further include a recorder to capture and store events. The recorder can rank stored events and record additional events by overwriting lower-ranked events. Ranking of stored events can be based on momentary spectrogram data, aggregated spectrogram data, statistical spectrogram data, hierarchical decision values, a decision indicator, or the like. The recorded events can improve the knowledge base for kernel training. The means for Doppler signal conditioning can be configured so a sensor complexity is decimated at the sensor and increased further upstream in a security chain. The sensor can provide early detection of a possible event by calculation of a Doppler signal standard deviation. The Doppler signal can be digitized, and in such embodiments, the digitized Doppler signal content is compressed, which can be summed to enable forward error correction. The intrusion alarm system can further include a communication protocol The communication protocol can be energy efficient and/or spectral efficient.
    These and other features of the systems and methods of the subject disclosure will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings and tables.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    So that those skilled in the art to which the subject disclosure appertains will readily understand how to make and use the devices of the subject disclosure without undue experimentation, preferred embodiments thereof will be described in detail herein below with reference to certain figures. TABLE 1 is a list of First Order Time Features; TABLE 2 is a list of Second Order Time Features; TABLE 3 is a list of functionalities of the selectivity mode switch; TABLE 4 is a list of optimization methods; and TABLE 5 is a list of alternatives for the SVM decision making algorithm. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram depicting the preferred embodiment in its application showing a surveillance space with a human and other moving targets; FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment; FIG. 3 is an explanatory graphical presentation of First Order Time Features; FIG. 4 is a hierarchical decision making graph with multiple time scales;
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
    Reference will now be made to the drawings wherein like reference numerals identify similar structural features or aspects of the subject disclosure. For purposes of explanation and illustration, and not limitation, a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a system for selective intrusion detection in accordance with the disclosure is shown in Fig. 1 and is designated by reference character 10. Other embodiments of systems and methods for detecting intrusions in accordance with the disclosure, or aspects thereof, are provided in Fig. 2, as will be described.
    Referring to Fig, 1, there is shown the preferred embodiment of the present disclosure for a selective intrusion detection system 10, The intrusion detection system 10 monitors a surveillance space 5. The surveillance space 5 shows moving targets- e.g. a tree 12, a heavy street traffic area including EMI, RFI, ESD and the like 13, a ceiling fan 14, a cat 15, a dog 16, and a human 20, The intrusion detection system 10 receives Doppler return signals 8 indicative of moving targets 12,13,14,15,16,20 present in and in the vicinity of the surveillance space 5, determines whether any signals are indicative of the presence of a human 20 or of another moving target 12,13,14,15,16, and provides an alert in the event a human 20 is indicated, and foregoes providing an alert in the event that other moving targets 12,13,14,15,16 are detected. The selectivity mode switch (ref. Table 3) influences the way the system behavior blends, to provide or forego an alarm in mixed events when a human 20 as well as other moving targets 12,13,14,15,16 are detected.
    Referring to Fig. 2, an explanatory schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the selective intrusion detection system is depicted. A Doppler front-end 21 including a sensitivity range setting 22 is operative in the surveillance area and its Doppler return signal from the moving targets present in the surveillance area is processed. At first a buffer 23 is used in order to provide sufficient windowing samples, for example Hanning-windowing, for the spectrogram generator 24 to operate. After completion of the spectral analysis, unneeded noise-columns as well as unwanted deterministic intrinsic building signals, RFI, and the like are removed by de-noising and whitening algorithms 25. Subsequently First Order Time Features 26 are calculated according to Table 1. The outcome of these First Order Time Features 26 is stored in a 3-second buffer 27. From this 3-second buffer 27, Second Order Time Features 28 are calculated according to Table 2. Furthermore statistical values 29 determined from the First Order Time Features 26 are calculated from the content of the 3-second buffer 27. Ail results from Second Order Time Features 28 calculations as well as the results from the statistical calculations 29 are incident to the Support Vector Machine 30. Mode-setting 31 influences the SVM Support Vector Machine decision threshold, residing in the SVM kernel, in order to adapt to the needed security and financial risk, according to Table 3, to suit the security application at hand. Mode-setting 31 may even select different pre-calculated SVM Kernels, since these Kernels contain all parameters needed for wanted real-truth decision making. Alternatives for the SVM decision making algorithm are shown in Table 5, Furthermore the output module 32 will alarm as a conclusion of hierarchical decision making.
    Referring to Fig. 3, the horizontal rhythmic lines show the time-evolution of the corresponding First Order Time Features torso velocity tracking 41» upper -6 dB point of the torso velocity 42» lower -6 dB point of the torso velocity 43» and leg velocity tracking 44. These features are a result of the spectrogram of the human body dynamics and biometric characteristics during movement. For a list of First Order Time Features, reference is made to Table 1. As shown in Fig. 3, the momentary average power generated by the leg 47 is calculated by these features. First the delta 45 is calculated between the upper and lower -6 dB points of the torso velocity. Then a sum 48 is taken of the upper -6 dB point of the torso velocity 42 and the delta 45. Finally the average of the amplitudes over the range from the sum 48 up to and including the leg velocity tracking 44 is used to obtain the momentary average power generated by the leg 47.
    From the teaching above it should be clear that time-feature analysis is designed to cany-out the human body dynamic analysis in order to track its rhythms and quirks, finding distinguishing factors of the nature (origin) of the target at hand. In electronics theory, Q-factor is conventionally calculated by using the -3 dB points; however, the -6 dB points were used for the set of predetermined factors to provide additional robustness to noise.
    Fig. 4 illustrates the hierarchical decision making where human decisions are available every 50-ms 901 and are combined by hierarchical decision making rules into robust decisions at each second 902, based on the decision indicator in time 903» and the decision threshold 905. The one-second decisions 902 are further combined into 3-second decisions (not visible in Fig, 4). The nonhuman decisions 904 are the result of other moving targets such as IBS Intrinsic Building Signals, EMI, RFI, ESD or pets and the like. These nonhuman decisions are taken at a lower level in the decision hierarchy, while the 50-ms decisions 901 are taken at a higher level and the one-second decisions 902 at an even higher level when an alarm may be triggered.
    The confidence level of the decision is low if the decision indicator 903 is close to the decision threshold 905, in the undecided interval [0.4, 0.6]. The confidence is high if the decision indicator 903 is close to 1 for human or 0 for non-human.
    Selectivity optimization A rich database with relevant Doppler signals from all events, as mentioned throughout this publication, has been logged, as well as labeled, with real truth analysis by and from experts. During the synthesis of the SVM kernels, regression methods where used to train the behavior of decision making to match this real-truth data as reported by experts.
    In order to boost robustness of the system behavior in adverse Doppler-input conditions, the selectivity of the embodiment has been further optimized by a plurality of methods as mentioned in Table 4. Many intruder attacks as well as quirky human and pet motions have been captured and trained in order to ascertain that the algorithms are living up to the expectations of the security installers and the “voice of their customers”, the users.
    Continuous improvement of the system behavior
    In order to continue improving the intrusion detection system of the present disclosure, the system has been be configured for real time learning by capturing events, adding the events to a database, and adjusting the algorithm. Several events will be stored in memory for diagnostic purposes. A ranking system for the events is based on: a) First as well as Second Order Time Features; b) hierarchical decision values; and c) human/other moving target identifier. When this buffer space is folly used, events will only be stored by overwriting a previously stored event. Since this action is destructive for the previously stored event, a smart decision will be taken. The criterion a), b) and c), already mentioned, is used to rank the priority of the events. The least useful event will be replaced with the new event. When needed the event will be read from the buffer and added to the learning database after real truth ranking by an expert. For example, events associated to missed detections or to false alarms are added to the learning database. By adding the most useful events in the learning database, the algorithm learning process yields more accurate results as time progresses, and is as a result thereby the driving continuous improvement of the selective intrusion detection system.
    Grid computing
    To better leverage available resources, the down-stream (sensor level) processing should be kept to a minimum. Thus only low complexity indicators are used to identify a quiescent state or a possible threat. In the case where more detailed analysis is needed for a selective intrusion detection, the data will not be processed locally. Rather, the data will be communicated up-stream (control panel level or central station level) for decision making by using an efficient protocol. In such case the tasks for the sensor to be executed are; (1) early detection of a possible event, e.g. by calculation of the Doppler signal standard deviation (RMS-value); (2) Doppler signal digitization; (3) source compression to reduce redundant data; (4) forward error correction to maximize good throughput; and (5) handling the communication protocol. These remaining tasks will decimate complexity of the decision making algorithms and enable up-stream processing. Implementation can be either wired or wireless, so long as the communication method remains efficient, in terms of energy consumption per bit communicated [nano-Joule/bit] and in terms of spectral efficiency [(bits/s)/Hz], To maintain an efficient communication method, interference with the radar, sonar and lidar operation should be avoided so as not to influence its Doppler output.

    权利要求:
    Claims (24)
    [1]
    A burmendring detection system, comprising: a radar transmitter-receiver configured and adapted to transmit and receive radar signals indicative of moving targets present in a surveillance room; a processor operatively connected to the radar transmitter-receiver for converting radar signals into spectrograms and for determining whether a random given spectrogram is indicative of the presence of a human or of another moving target in the surveillance room; and an alarm operatively connected to the processor, the processor and the alarm being configured to provide a warning in the event that the processor determines that a randomly given spectrogram is indicative of a human, and for not providing a warning in the event that the processor determines that a randomly given spectrogram is only indicative of another moving target.
    [2]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured and arranged to determine whether a random given spectrogram is indicative of a human on the basis of a set of predetermined factors.
    [3]
    The intrusion detection system according to claim 2, wherein the set of predetermined factors is obtained from an experimental data set by: extracting coefficients from spectrograms of the experimental data set using at least one of a filter, a transformation, a weighted average, and a Goertzel transformation; and calculating the set of predetermined factors from the extracted coefficients by means of at least one of a averaging function, maximum function, standard deviation, derivative, sorting, cumulative sum, moving average, correlation, and period estimate.
    [4]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 2, wherein the processor is configured to determine whether the set of predetermined factors are humanly selected based on a latent semantic method.
    [5]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 2, wherein the set of predetermined factors is extracted from a database of signals representative of movements of humans, pets, and other purposes and is obtained by learning performed by at least one of optimizations, iterations, heuristics, and recursive techniques; and wherein the processor is configured to determine whether the predefined factors are indicative of a human and configured to trigger the alarm based on at least one of: rules, regressions, support vector machine (Eng: "support vector machine") , probabilistic latent semantic method, nearest neighbor classification, probabilities, and indicator functions that are compared to a predetermined threshold value.
    [6]
    The intrusion detection system according to claim 2, wherein the set of predetermined factors comprise first order time features, comprising at least one of: torso speed measurement, upper -6dB of torso speed, lower -6dB of torso speed, delta between upper and lower -6dB of torso speed , torso-generated power, bone-generated average power, average power per short time Fourier transformation, average power of the frequencies between upper and lower 06 dB points, average of frequency indices with power higher than 20 dB / Hz, 70%, 85 % and 95% of a cumulative sum of power per short time Fourier transformation, and Q factor.
    [7]
    The intrusion detection system according to claim 2, wherein the set of predetermined factors comprises second order time characteristics, comprising at least one of: average torso / body power, torso period, phase between leg Doppler signal chirper period and torso Doppler signal period, average Q factor, standard deviation of Q factor, ratio between peak leg speed and average torso speed, average of power spectrum profile, standard deviation of power spectrum profile, upper -6 dB point of torso / body speed period, lower -6 dB point of torso / body speed period, phase between torso period and upper -6 dB point of torso period, phase between torso period and lower -6 dB point of torso period, phase between upper -6 dB point of torso period and lower -6 dB point of torso period, ratio between average torso energy and average leg energy, standard deviation of amplitude of frequencies available in torso and body signals, standard deviati e of amplitude of frequencies available in bone Dopplerchirp signal, average of delta frequency between upper and lower frequency points, standard deviation of delta frequency between upper and lower frequency points.
    [8]
    The intrusion detection system according to claim 2, wherein the set of predetermined factors are selected by correlations and mutual information for optimizing system selectivity and a robustness against noise for minimizing calculation work.
    [9]
    The intrusion detection system according to claim 1, wherein the processor is configured and arranged to determine whether a random given spectrogram is indicative of a human, based on a predetermined algorithm that calculates an indicator of the presence of a human or other moving target,
    [10]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 9, wherein the processor and alarm are configured to provide a warning if the indicator has a value greater than a predetermined threshold value.
    [11]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured and arranged to convert radar signals into spectrograms by using a set of modules comprising at least one of: windowing, overlapping, short time Fourier transformation, truncating (Clipping:), interval quantification (binning), noise elimination, logarithmic conversion, amplitude correction, time grouping, whitening (horizontal whitening), spectrum generator block diagram, Cepstrum analysis, wavelet analysis, vertical flattening and horizontal flattening.
    [12]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, wherein the processor comprises a support vector machine, the support vector machine comprising: local core components and global core components extending over an entire domain of events; and wherein core parameters are optimized for human selectivity and few false alarms through the use of a database of representative signals from people, pets, and other moving targets.
    [13]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 12, wherein the local core components comprise Gaussian functions for separating islands from different classes of events.
    [14]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 12, wherein the global core components include linear functions, multivariate polynomials, or step type functions, such that the global components provide a generalization across the entire domain of events.
    [15]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 12, wherein the optimization of the parameters is performed by at least one of an accelerated random search and a global optimization procedure.
    [16]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, wherein the determination of the processor is optimized by at least one of: the decision thresholds, data processing parameters, time attribute parameters, and time attribute weights; wherein optimization comprises at least one of: accelerated random search optimization, evolutionary optimization, gradient-based optimization, simulated annealing, genetic optimization, pattern search, optimization by use of reaction surfaces, optimization using surrogates, interval methods, and hierarchical methods; and where optimization is separated into partial problems that are sequentially optimized.
    [17]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, further comprising a selectivity mode adjuster for matching sensitivity to a particular application and a certain risk level.
    [18]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, further comprising an area control operatively connected to the radar transmitter-receiver for setting the coverage volume of the surveillance space.
    [19]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, further comprising a smart diagnostics system operably connected to the processor for storing spectrograms and corresponding user input for human / other moving target determinations in a database and for updating processor determination processes based on the database.
    [20]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, further comprising communication means operably connected to the processor for sending spectrograms to an upstream (upstream) server for enabling detailed selectivity processing further upstream (Eng. ") And to reduce complexity and current consumption restrictions downstream (Eng ,:" downstream "),
    [21]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, wherein the processor comprises a noise determination system, comprising at least one of: energy measurements, background filter approaches, and measurements of randomness.
    [22]
    The intrusion detection system of claim 1, wherein the processor comprises an activation detection system, comprising at least one of: energy measurements and heuristics.
    [23]
    An intrusion detection system for detecting the presence of a moving target in the presence of interfering phenomena, comprising: a Doppler transmitter-receiver for transmitting signals in a surveillance zone; means for receiving Doppler signals returned from the surveillance zone; means for providing a spectrogram; and means for scene analysis of the spectrogram for determining the respective origin of Doppler targets for providing reliable intrusion protection and preventing privacy issues.
    [24]
    An intrusion detection system for detecting the presence of a moving target in the presence of interfering phenomena, comprising: a Doppler transmitter-receiver for transmitting signals in a surveillance zone; means for receiving Doppler signals returned from the surveillance zone; means for providing a spectrogram; Doppler signal conditioning means; means for scene analysis from current spectrogram data; means for evaluating aggregated data; means for providing statistical analysis; and wherein the means for receiving Doppler signals, the means for providing a spectrogram, the means for Doppler signal conditioning, the means for scene analysis, the means for evaluating aggregated data, and the means for providing statistical analysis be operatively connected to a support vector machine on which a learning core is loaded, which learning core is trained with real truths from a plurality of cases, followed by hierarchical decision procedure, to provide a warning in the case of the presence of a human target in the surveillance zone and for not issuing a warning in the case of another moving target and reference phenomena.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    NL2012327B1|2016-06-21|Selective intrusion detection systems.
    JP2021506149A|2021-02-18|Motion detection based on machine learning of radio signal characteristics
    US8682821B2|2014-03-25|Method for detection of movement of a specific type of object or animal based on radar signals
    US9461846B2|2016-10-04|Multilayered configurable data fusion systems and methods for power and bandwidth efficient sensor networks
    US20110032139A1|2011-02-10|Method for human only activity detection based on radar signals
    US7710265B2|2010-05-04|Systems and methods for dynamic situational signal processing for target detection and classification
    US9435882B2|2016-09-06|Method and apparatus for cognitive nonlinear radar
    US20180356509A1|2018-12-13|Radar-based detection system
    WO2012119253A1|2012-09-13|Area monitoring method and system
    WO2010118233A2|2010-10-14|Cadence analysis of temporal gait patterns for seismic discrimination
    US7656288B2|2010-02-02|Systems and methods for automatic proactive pattern recognition at a control center database
    US11093738B2|2021-08-17|Systems and methods for detecting flying animals
    Parihar et al.2021|Seismic signal analysis for the characterisation of elephant movements in a forest environment
    EP3812791A1|2021-04-28|Integration of tracking with classifier in mmwave radar
    US20110199861A1|2011-08-18|Method and system for detecting motorized objects
    US7714714B2|2010-05-11|Systems and methods for situational feature set selection for target classification
    US20110098932A1|2011-04-28|Method and apparatus for detecting pedestrians
    US7710264B2|2010-05-04|Systems and methods for power efficient situation aware seismic detection and classification
    Iqbal et al.2018|Indoor motion classification using passive RF sensing incorporating deep learning
    Schumer2010|Time-domain classification of humans using seismic sensors
    Ribeiro et al.2021|Multiobjective optimization design procedures for data-driven unmanned aerial vehicles automatic target recognition systems
    Yang et al.2017|When Clutter Reduction Meets Machine Learning for People Counting Using IR-UWB Radar
    Kang et al.2015|Footstep Detection and Classification Algorithms based Seismic Sensor
    IL206454A|2011-06-30|Method and system for detecting motorized objects
    IL181853A|2011-02-28|Method and system for detecting motorized objects
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    NL2012327B1|2016-06-21|
    US11080974B2|2021-08-03|
    US20210319678A1|2021-10-14|
    EP3080641A1|2016-10-19|
    WO2015088664A1|2015-06-18|
    US20160307418A1|2016-10-20|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US20100027378A1|2006-04-25|2010-02-04|University Of Mississippi|Methods for detecting humans|
    US20110032139A1|2009-08-10|2011-02-10|Robert Bosch Gmbh|Method for human only activity detection based on radar signals|
    WO2012119253A1|2011-03-08|2012-09-13|Home Monitor Inc.|Area monitoring method and system|
    WO2013064571A1|2011-11-03|2013-05-10|Thales Nederland B.V.|System for characterizing motion of an individual, notably a human individual, and associated method|
    US3383678A|1966-12-23|1968-05-14|Advanced Devices Lab Inc|Moving object detection system|
    US3967283A|1974-02-13|1976-06-29|Automation Industries, Inc.|Large area motion sensor|
    US5276427A|1991-07-08|1994-01-04|Digital Security Controls Ltd.|Auto-adjust motion detection system|
    EP0624857B1|1993-05-11|1998-09-09|Optex Co. Ltd.|Passive type moving object detection system|
    US5473311A|1994-09-16|1995-12-05|C&K Systems, Inc.|Method and apparatus to distinguish human intruder and animal intruder|
    US5670943A|1996-02-26|1997-09-23|Detection Systems, Inc.|Pet immune intruder detection|
    IT1289800B1|1996-12-24|1998-10-16|Tecno Alarm S N C Di Trucchi L|ELECTRONIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL DEVICE.|
    US6097429A|1997-08-01|2000-08-01|Esco Electronics Corporation|Site control unit for video security system|
    US6215399B1|1997-11-10|2001-04-10|Shmuel Hershkovitz|Passive infrared motion detector and method|
    IL138708A|1998-01-04|2004-08-31|Visonic Ltd|Passive infra-red intrusion sensing system covering downward zone|
    JP2000155177A|1998-11-20|2000-06-06|Nikon Corp|Human body detecting device and detecting method therefor|
    US6239736B1|1999-04-21|2001-05-29|Interlogix, Inc.|Range-gated radar motion detector|
    DE59909044D1|1999-10-01|2004-05-06|Siemens Building Tech Ag|Passive infrared detector|
    CA2300644C|2000-03-10|2009-07-14|Digital Security Controls Ltd.|Pet resistant pir detector|
    US6265972B1|2000-05-15|2001-07-24|Digital Security Controls Ltd.|Pet resistant pir detector|
    EP1494586A4|2002-03-25|2009-07-22|Hoana Medical Inc|Passive physiological monitoring system|
    US7075431B2|2003-08-18|2006-07-11|Honeywell International Inc.|Logical pet immune intrusion detection apparatus and method|
    DE502004008486D1|2004-07-02|2009-01-02|Siemens Ag|Passive infrared detector|
    US7457441B2|2005-02-25|2008-11-25|Aptina Imaging Corporation|System and method for detecting thermal anomalies|
    WO2006105094A2|2005-03-29|2006-10-05|Duke University|Sensor system for identifying and tracking movements of multiple sources|
    NO322340B1|2005-05-18|2006-09-18|Idtec Pte Ltd|Burglary detection system and method|
    US7619517B2|2005-09-30|2009-11-17|Inet Consulting Limited Company|Alarm for selectively detecting intrusions by persons|
    US7375630B2|2006-01-27|2008-05-20|Honeywell International Inc.|Dual technology sensor device with range gated sensitivity|
    US7772965B2|2006-08-07|2010-08-10|Farhan Fariborz M|Remote wellness monitoring system with universally accessible interface|
    US7616115B2|2007-02-13|2009-11-10|Honeywell International Inc.|Sensor for detecting human intruders, and security system|
    JP5590762B2|2007-02-15|2014-09-17|アツミ電氣株式会社|Hot wire sensor|
    US7705730B2|2007-03-07|2010-04-27|Robert Bosch Gmbh|System and method for improving microwave detector performance using ranging microwave function|
    US7679509B2|2007-03-07|2010-03-16|Robert Bosch Gmbh|System and method for improving infrared detector performance in dual detector system|
    US8063375B2|2007-06-22|2011-11-22|Intel-Ge Care Innovations Llc|Sensible motion detector|
    US8102261B2|2008-07-17|2012-01-24|Honeywell International Inc.|Microwave ranging sensor|
    US8410923B2|2008-11-25|2013-04-02|Randall Wang|Single MCU-based motion detection, local alarm and supervisory arrangement for alarm system|
    US8035514B2|2008-12-10|2011-10-11|Honeywell International Inc.|Method to improve white light immunity of infrared motion detectors|
    CN102737463A|2011-04-07|2012-10-17|胡茂林|Monitoring and alarming system for indoor personnel intrusion based on intelligent video|
    KR101776703B1|2011-10-14|2017-09-08|한화테크윈 주식회사|Ladar and Method for object detecting using ladar|
    US20140304600A1|2011-10-19|2014-10-09|Cornell University|Systems and methods for identifying objects|
    US20130177879A1|2012-01-10|2013-07-11|Franklin Electronic Publishers, Incorporated|Wireless processing system and method|US10140827B2|2014-07-07|2018-11-27|Google Llc|Method and system for processing motion event notifications|
    US9420331B2|2014-07-07|2016-08-16|Google Inc.|Method and system for categorizing detected motion events|
    US9501915B1|2014-07-07|2016-11-22|Google Inc.|Systems and methods for analyzing a video stream|
    USD782495S1|2014-10-07|2017-03-28|Google Inc.|Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface|
    JP6648435B2|2015-07-23|2020-02-14|沖電気工業株式会社|Discrimination device, discrimination method, program, model generation device, and model generation method|
    US10506237B1|2016-05-27|2019-12-10|Google Llc|Methods and devices for dynamic adaptation of encoding bitrate for video streaming|
    US10957171B2|2016-07-11|2021-03-23|Google Llc|Methods and systems for providing event alerts|
    US10380429B2|2016-07-11|2019-08-13|Google Llc|Methods and systems for person detection in a video feed|
    US10192415B2|2016-07-11|2019-01-29|Google Llc|Methods and systems for providing intelligent alerts for events|
    US10410086B2|2017-05-30|2019-09-10|Google Llc|Systems and methods of person recognition in video streams|
    US11256951B2|2017-05-30|2022-02-22|Google Llc|Systems and methods of person recognition in video streams|
    KR102036033B1|2017-08-24|2019-10-24|주식회사 우리로|Apparatus and method for motion sensing using doppler radar|
    US10664688B2|2017-09-20|2020-05-26|Google Llc|Systems and methods of detecting and responding to a visitor to a smart home environment|
    CN107592506B|2017-09-26|2020-06-30|英华达（上海）科技有限公司|Monitoring method, monitoring device and monitoring system|
    JP6989766B2|2017-09-29|2022-01-12|ミツミ電機株式会社|Radar device and target detection method|
    KR101927364B1|2017-12-13|2018-12-10|주식회사 에스원|Outside Intruding and Monitering Radar Syatem Based on Deep -Learning and Method thereof|
    US10312954B1|2017-12-25|2019-06-04|International Business Machines Corporation|Identification of RFI |
    US10928502B2|2018-05-30|2021-02-23|Richwave Technology Corp.|Methods and apparatus for detecting presence of an object in an environment|
    US10948581B2|2018-05-30|2021-03-16|Richwave Technology Corp.|Methods and apparatus for detecting presence of an object in an environment|
    CN108765832B|2018-07-06|2020-06-19|厦门信通慧安科技有限公司|Intrusion detection method and device|
    TWI677698B|2018-11-16|2019-11-21|昇雷科技股份有限公司|Biometric detection method and biometric detection radar|
    KR102262197B1|2018-12-11|2021-06-07|주식회사 한화|Apparatus and method for estimating the shape of a target using fmcw radar signals|
    法律状态:
    2017-10-04| MM| Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual fee|Effective date: 20170301 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    US201361915868P| true| 2013-12-13|2013-12-13|
    US201361915868|2013-12-13|
    [返回顶部]